Saturday, 7 March 2015

International women's day-A synopsis


                       In October 1884, a convention held by the Federation of Organized Trades and Labor Unions unanimously set May 1, 1886, as the date by which the eight-hour work day would become standard. As the chosen date approached, U.S. labor unions prepared for a general strike in support of the eight-hour day. On Saturday, May 1, thousands of workers went on strike and rallies were held throughout the United States, with the cry, "Eight-hour day with no cut in pay." Estimates of the number of striking workers across the U.S. range from 300,000 to half a million. On May 3, striking workers in Chicago met near the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company plant. Union molders at the plant had been locked out since early February and the predominantly Irish-American workers at McCormick had come under attack from Pinkerton guards during an earlier strike action in 1885. Despite calls for calm by Spies, the police fired on the crowd. The rally began peacefully under a light rain on the evening of May 4. Spies, Albert Parsons, and Samuel Fielden spoke to a crowd estimated variously between 600 and 3,000 while standing in an open wagon adjacent to the square on Des Plaines Street. A large number of on-duty police officers watched from nearby. Reportedly a home-made bomb with a brittle metal casing filled with dynamite and ignited by a fuse, was thrown into the path of the advancing police. Its fuse briefly sputtered, then the bomb exploded, killing policeman Mathias J. Degan with flying metal fragments and mortally wounding six other officers. Witnesses maintained that immediately after the bomb blast there was an exchange of gunshots between police and demonstrators. The scene was of "wild carnage" and estimated at least fifty dead or wounded civilians lay in the streets. 

                               Emma Goldman, (June 27, 1869 – May 14, 1940) was the earliest known feminist activist. Attracted to anarchism after the Haymarket affair, Goldman became a writer and a renowned lecturer on anarchist philosophy, women's rights, and social issues, attracting crowds of thousands. She and anarchist writer Alexander Berkman, her lover and lifelong friend, planned to assassinate industrialist and financier Henry Clay Frick as an act of propaganda of the deed. Although Frick survived the attempt on his life, Berkman was sentenced to 22 years in prison. Goldman was imprisoned several times in the years that followed, for "inciting to riot" and illegally distributing information about birth control. In 1906, Goldman founded the anarchist journal Mother Earth. ( Emma Goldman played a pivotal role in the development of anarchist political philosophy in North America and Europe in the first half of the 20th century. 
Born in Kovno in the Russian Empire (present-day Kaunas, Lithuania), Goldman emigrated to the US in 1885 and lived in New York City, where she joined the burgeoning anarchist movement in 1889.) During her life, Goldman was lionized as a free-thinking "rebel woman" by admirers, and denounced by critics as an advocate of politically motivated murder and violent revolution. Her writing and lectures spanned a wide variety of issues, including prisons, atheism, freedom of speech, militarism, capitalism, marriage, free love, and homosexuality. Although she distanced herself from first-wave feminism and its efforts toward women's suffrage, she developed new ways of incorporating gender politics into anarchism. After decades of obscurity, Goldman's iconic status was revived in the 1970s, when feminist and anarchist scholars rekindled popular interest in her life. 

                                  Clara Zetkin ( 5 July 1857 – 20 June 1933) was a German Marxist theorist, activist, and advocate for women's rights. In 1911, she organized the first International Women's Day. Until 1917, she was active in the Social Democratic Party of Germany, then she joined the Independent Social Democratic Party of Germany (USPD) and its far-left wing, the Spartacist League; this later became the Communist Party of Germany (KPD), which she represented in the Reichstag during the Weimar Republic from 1920 to 1933. Zetkin developed connections with the women's movement and the labour movement in Germany from 1874. In 1878 she joined the Socialist Workers' Party. In 1890 its name was changed to its modern version Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD). In the SPD, Zetkin, along with Rosa Luxemburg, her close friend and confidante, was one of the main figures of the far-left wing of the party.

                                              The International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union (ILGWU) was once one of the largest labor unions in the United States, one of the first U.S. unions to have a primarily female membership, and a key player in the labor history of the 1920s and 1930s. The ILGWU was founded in 1900 in New York City by seven local unions, with a few thousand members between them. The union grew rapidly in the next few years but began to stagnate as the conservative leadership favored the interests of skilled workers, such as cutters. This did not sit well with the majority of immigrant workers, particularly Jewish workers with a background in Bundist activities in Tsarist Russia, or with Polish and Italian workers, many of whom had strong socialist and anarchist leanings. The ILGWU had a sudden upsurge in membership that came as the result of two successful mass strikes in New York City. The first, in 1909, was known as “the Uprising of 20,000” and lasted for fourteen weeks. It was largely spontaneous, sparked by a short walkout of workers of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory, involving only about 20% of the workforce. That, however, only prompted the rest of the workers to seek help from the union. The firm locked out its employees when it learned what was happening.  The news of the strike spread quickly to all the New York garment workers. At a series of mass meetings, after the leading figures of the American labor movement spoke in general terms about the need for solidarity and preparedness, Clara Lemlich rose to speak about the conditions she and other women worked under and demanded an end to talk and the calling of a strike of the entire industry. The crowd responded enthusiastically and, after taking a traditional Yiddish oath, "If I turn traitor to the cause I now pledge, may this hand wither from the arm I now raise," voted for a general strike. Approximately 20,000 out of the 32,000 workers in the shirtwaist trade walked out in the next two days. Those workers – primarily immigrants and mostly women – defied the preconceptions of more conservative labor leaders, who thought that immigrants and women could not be organized. Their slogan "We'd rather starve quick than starve slow" summed up the depth of their bitterness against the sweatshops in which they worked. The strike was a violent one. Police routinely arrested picketers for trivial or imaginary offenses while employers hired local thugs to beat them as police looked the other way. A group of wealthy women, among them Frances Perkins, Anne Morgan, and Alva Vanderbilt Belmont, supported the struggles of working class women with money and intervention with officials and often picketed with them. They earned the derisive label "the mink brigade". The strike was only partially successful. The ILGWU accepted an arbitrated settlement in February 1910 that improved workers' wages, working conditions, and hours, but did not provide union recognition. A number of companies, including the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory, refused to sign the agreement. But even so, the strike won a number of important gains. It encouraged workers in the industry to take action to improve their conditions, brought public attention to the sweatshop conditions. Several months later, in 1910, the ILGWU led an even larger strike, later named "The Great Revolt", of 60,000 cloakmakers. After months of picketing, prominent members of the Jewish community, led by Louis Brandeis, mediated between the ILGWU and the Manufacturers Association. The employers won a promise that workers would settle their grievances through arbitration rather than strikes during the term of the Agreement (a common clause in Union contracts today).

The union also became more involved in electoral politics, in part as a result of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire on March 25, 1911, in which one hundred and forty-six shirtwaist makers (most of them young immigrant women) either died in the fire that broke out on the eighth floor of the factory, or jumped to their deaths. Many of these workers were unable to escape because the doors on their floors had been locked to prevent them from stealing or taking unauthorized breaks. More than 100,000 people participated in the funeral march for the victims. The fire had differing effects on the community. For some it radicalized them still further; as Rose Schneiderman said in her speech at the memorial meeting held in the Metropolitan Opera House on April 2, 1911 to an audience largely made up of the well-heeled members of the Women's Trade Union League (WTUL) " I would be a traitor to these poor burned bodies if I came here to talk good fellowship. We have tried you good people of the public and we have found you wanting. The old Inquisition had its rack and its thumbscrews and its instruments of torture with iron teeth. We know what these things are today; the iron teeth are our necessities, the thumbscrews are the high-powered and swift machinery close to which we must work, and the rack is here in the firetrap structures that will destroy us the minute they catch on fire. 
This is not the first time girls have been burned alive in the city. Every week I must learn of the untimely death of one of my sister workers. Every year thousands of us are maimed. The life of men and women is so cheap and property is so sacred. There are so many of us for one job it matters little if 146 of us are burned to death. 
We have tried you citizens; we are trying you now, and you have a couple of dollars for the sorrowing mothers, brothers and sisters by way of a charity gift. But every time the workers come out in the only way they know to protest against conditions which are unbearable the strong hand of the law is allowed to press down heavily upon us. Public officials have only words of warning to us – warning that we must be intensely peaceable, and they have the workhouse just back of all their warnings. The strong hand of the law beats us back, when we rise, into the conditions that make life unbearable. I can't talk fellowship to you who are gathered here. Too much blood has been spilled. I know from my experience it is up to the working people to save themselves. The only way they can save themselves is by a strong working-class movement." Others in the union drew a different lesson from events: working with local Tammany Hall officials, such as Al Smith and Robert F. Wagner, and progressive reformers, such as Frances Perkins, they pushed for comprehensive safety and workers’ compensation laws. The ILG leadership formed bonds with those reformers and politicians that would continue for another forty years, through the New Deal and beyond. 


In August 1910, an International Women's Conference was organized to precede the general meeting of the Socialist Second International in Copenhagen, Denmark. Inspired in part by the American socialists, German Socialist Luise Zietz proposed the establishment of an annual 'International Woman's Day' (singular) and was seconded by fellow socialist and later communist leader Clara Zetkin, although no date was specified at that conference. Delegates (100 women from 17 countries) agreed with the idea as a strategy to promote equal rights, including suffrage, for women. The following year, on March 19, 1911, IWD was marked for the first time, by over a million people in Austria, Denmark, Germany and Switzerland. In the Austro-Hungarian Empire alone, there were 300 demonstrations. In Vienna, women paraded on the Ringstrasse and carried banners honouring the martyrs of the Paris Commune. Women demanded that women be given the right to vote and to hold public office. They also protested against employment sex discrimination. Americans continued to celebrate National Women's Day on the last Sunday in February. Female members of the Australian Builders Labourers Federation march on International Women's Day 1975 in Sydney 
In 1913 Russian women observed their first International Women's Day on the last Sunday in February (by Julian calendar then used in Russia). 


Although there were some women-led strikes, marches, and other protests in the years leading up to 1914, none of them happened on March 8. In 1914 International Women's Day was held on March 8, possibly because that day was a Sunday, and now it is always held on March 8 in all countries. The 1914 observance of the Day in Germany was dedicated to women's right to vote, which German women did not win until 1918. 

In London there was a march from Bow to Trafalgar Square in support of women's suffrage on 8 March 1914. Sylvia Pankhurst was arrested in front of Charing Cross station on her way to speak in Trafalgar Square. 

In 1917 demonstrations marking International Women's Day in Saint Petersburg on the last Sunday in February (which fell on March 8 on the Gregorian calendar) initiated the February Revolution. Women in Saint Petersburg went on strike that day for “Bread and Peace" - demanding the end of World War I, an end to Russian food shortages, and the end of czarism. Leon Trotsky wrote, "23 February (8th March) was International Woman’s Day and meetings and actions were foreseen. But we did not imagine that this ‘Women’s Day’ would inaugurate the revolution. Revolutionary actions were foreseen but without date. But in morning, despite the orders to the contrary, textile workers left their work in several factories and sent delegates to ask for support of the strike… which led to mass strike... all went out into the streets." 

Following the October Revolution, the Bolshevik Alexandra Kollontai and Vladimir Lenin made it an official holiday in the Soviet Union, and it was established, but was a working day until 1965. On May 8th, 1965 by the decree of the USSR Presidium of the Supreme Soviet International Women's Day was declared a non-working day in the USSR "in commemoration of the outstanding merits of Soviet women in communistic construction, in the defense of their Fatherland during the Great Patriotic War, in their heroism and selflessness at the front and in the rear, and also marking the great contribution of women to strengthening friendship between peoples, and the struggle for peace. But still, women's day must be celebrated as are other holidays." 

From its official adoption in Russia following the Soviet Revolution in 1917 the holiday was predominantly celebrated in communist and socialist countries. It was celebrated by the communists in China from 1922, and by Spanish communists from 1936.[10] After the founding of the People's Republic of China on October 1, 1949 the state council proclaimed on December 23 that March 8 would be made an official holiday with women in China given a half-day off. 

In the West, International Women's Day was first observed as a popular event after 1977 when the United Nations General Assembly invited member states to proclaim March 8 as the UN Day for women's rights and world peace. 

Thank you.




Monday, 30 September 2013

AWARENESS & AWAKENING

"Being eternal energy, the soul is neither the intellect nor is it the instinct. It is the amount of spiritual energy retained by a living being. It is the spiritual energy that is seen in a living being's eyes. Just like any other form of energy, spiritual energy changes are propagated through waves. Waves can be thought of as connected local oscillations that take place within a medium. For example, audible sound waves are oscillations of local pressure through air that transfer acoustic energy from its source to our eardrum, making it vibrate. At the beginning of the nineteenth century, Albert Einstein, in his theory of relativity proved that mass and energy are interchangeable. Thus, the law of conservation of mass discovered by Antoine Lavoisier, and the law of conservation of energy formulated later by James Prescott Joule, were united. In the context of this modern theory of physics, the philosophical concept of "dualism," which separates soul from matter, cannot exist because the Universe and all of its components are only different manifestations of the Universal energy, which can neither be created or destroyed. It can only be converted from one form to another. The law of conservation of energy, as a whole, gives the soul its immortality feature." - Marian Barasch 

Darwin's Perspective: Although Einstein helped us understand that energy and mass are interchangeable, it is difficult for us to believe this when it comes to our own physical bodies. Not only do our bodies feel solid but as they interact with other objects (i.e. mass) we experience very real physical interactions. Every time we bump our head, we're reminded of the physical nature of our Body. 

But despite this perception, our understanding of physics tells us that energy and mass are interchangeable and thus are simply different forms of the same thing. As such, our physical understanding of life is only providing us with a version of reality. In truth, there are energy waves coming into us and emanating from us all the time. The entire process of interchanging mass for energy is very much a a part of our existence (e.g. eating). 

Accordingly, the life force energy of God that flows through the Universe is no different than the mass that you consider to be "you." Make no mistake, you are the collective consciousness of your Body, Spirit and Mind. That Body of yours is a very real and physical manifestation of divine energy. And if you choose to put your Body into motion without conscious consideration, you will meet with a very physical interaction with your environment. This is not a fluffy call for you to conclude that you are energy and thus reality doesn't matter. Quite the opposite, you are divine energy and employing your current form in harmony with your divine purpose is your calling. 

But so too you are not independent of the energy around you. The sound, light and pressure waves that interact with you are very real. So too your actions cause energy to interact with others is very real too. Your willingness to employ this energy in divine cause is what we call awareness. Being aware of your pivotal role to play in life is the path of your own private awakening. 

And as you are now awakening from this slumber, your ability to remain asleep is no longer available to you. It is time to act. It is time to pursue your purpose. For you are a divinely inspired life with a role to play. 


First published by Deepankar Choudhury on 20th June, 2011


Monday, 16 September 2013

Euthanasia - Briefings

INTRODUCTION. 
One of the principal questions in contemporary medical ethics that bleeds into societal morality is the question of euthanasia. Should modern medicine do all it can to save a patient, or should quality of life issues enter into the question? What is the moral balance between preserving life and preventing a once vital human from remaining comatose, sometimes for years? Should religious beliefs prevent medical professionals from helping to ease the pain and suffering of prolonged treatment in a terminally ill patient? 

1> RECENT DEVELOPMENTS. 
The Supreme Court of India on Monday rejected a petition for mercy killing, but ruled that passive euthanasia was permissible under certain circumstances. The case centered around Aruna Shanbaug, a former nurse who was raped and strangled at work 37 years ago and has been in Mumbai's King Edward Memorial Hospital in a blind and vegetative state ever since. Pinki Virani, a journalist and friend, petitioned the court [Hindustan Times report] to stop hospital staff from force feeding Shanbaug and allow her to die. The court stated that, while there is no statutory provision to support active euthanasia, where an individual dies by lethal injection, passive euthanasia through a withdrawal of life support would be permissible with approval by the high court after receiving requests from the government and close family members of the individual and getting the opinions of three respected doctors. The court determined that Virani was not as close to Shanbaug as hospital staff and rejected her petition. 

2> COMA 

Coma is a prolonged period of unconsciousness. Unconsciousness is the lack of appreciation of (or reaction to) a stimulus. Coma differs from sleep in that one cannot be aroused from a coma. 

Coma involves two different concepts: 

1.) Reactivity: Reactivity refers to the innate (or inborn) functions of the brain, i.e., the telereceptors (eyes and ears), the nociceptors (responses to pain), the arousal reaction (wakefulness) and the orienting response (turning one's head toward the source of sound or movement). We could also refer to these as reflexive movements. 

2.) Perceptivity: Perceptivity refers to the responses of the nervous system to stimuli, which have been learned or acquired, i.e., language, communication skills, individual methods of movement such as gestures, etc. Perceptivity also refers to less complex learned or acquired reactions such as flinching when threatened. We can also think of these as conscious movements. 

A person in a coma does not exhibit reactivity or perceptivity. He/she can not be aroused by calling his/her name or in response to pain. 
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

New Evidence That Coma Patients Feel Pain 

Their is increasing research which shows that individuals in a comatose state who were previously thought to be incapable of feeling pain, are in fact aware of pain and require pain medication. 

Coma is a poor term to describe the various states of unconsciousness. Better terms have been developed which classify patients in three stages, Coma, Vegetative State and the Minimally Conscious State. However, it is important to know that their are frequent errors made in the diagnosis of a patient's particular stage of consciousness and studies have shown that upwards of 41 percent of patients diagnosed as being in a vegetative state are actually in a minimally conscious state. 

A new study evaluating brain scans of patients in various stages of coma has found that many of these individuals in both the vegetative state and the minimally conscious state are able to perceive and react to pain. This study is strong evidence that these individuals previously thought to be "brain dead" are capable of awareness and require pain medication. 

The full study is in the October issue of the Lancet Neurology journal.

3> MEDICAL ETHICS & EUTHANASIA 

One popular account of medical ethics, makes appeal to "the four principles": 
1. non-maleficence (to avoid harm) 
2. beneficence (to do good) 
3. autonomy (the right to act freely) and 
4. justice (acting fairly towards the patient). 

Leaving aside the obvious shortcomings of such an abbreviated approach to medical ethics, we can nevertheless see how euthanasia by neglect violates all four principles: 

1. Euthanasia by neglect is maleficent: it causes harm by killing a patient through a very long drawn out process of starvation and dehydration, a process which is uncomfortable and painful for the patient. 

2. Euthanasia by neglect cannot be beneficent: A doctor is ethically and legally obliged to act in a patient's best interests. Intentionally killing the patient by neglect of reasonable care can never be in the patient's best interests. 

3. Euthanasia by neglect extinguishes the autonomy of patients and diminishes the autonomy of doctors. Autonomy is not an absolute the exercise of which trumps all other considerations.. The patient must exercise his or her right to autonomy in a responsible and ethically sound manner. Both ethics and the law say that, just as we cannot sell ourselves into slavery, we cannot consent to be murdered. This is because the right to life, like the right to liberty, is inalienable. The obligation to respect the right to life extends to respecting one's own life. It is unethical to intentionally deprive oneself of life. Making euthanasia by neglect available to patients would lead to pressure on doctors and nurses to assist suicide and intentionally kill their patients by neglect. The effect of this is to significantly diminish their autonomy to practice their professional arts ethically, and according to their consciences and the Hippocratic Oath. Legalizing assisted suicide and intentional killing by neglect of reasonable care turns a class of private citizens into public killers. It changes doctors and nurses from being healers and carers into poisoners and killers. 

4. Euthanasia by neglect violates justice, the requirement to treat all patients impartially and to be fair when allocating health care resources. The possibility of euthanasia by neglect would lead to pressure (real or perceived) on the elderly and the chronically ill to cease being a burden on society, on the health service, and on their relatives. Legalizing euthanasia by neglect reduces the patient from being an individual to whom the doctor has a professional obligation, into a utile, a unit in a utilitarian system of healthcare rationing, with an implied duty to die if they became too difficult or time-consuming or expensive to treat.

4> IN USA. 

The Mental Capacity Bill - legalising euthanasia by neglect 


The Mental Capacity Bill, introduced into Parliament by the Government on 18 June, will legalise euthanasia by neglect 

Patients with conditions like dementia, stroke or brain injury are most at risk. They may be killed by withholding their basic medical care or even food and fluids, if the Bill goes through. Euthanasia by neglect means deliberately killing patients by withholding or withdrawing reasonable medical treatment or basic care (such as food and fluids given by tube). The worldwide euthanasia movement has declared that the legalisation of euthanasia by neglect is one of its key goals in its campaign to legalise euthanasia by lethal injection. 

Any alleged benefits of the Bill pale in comparison with the evils it legalises. The Government claims that the Bill gives people a greater say in how they will be treated if they have a disease or accident that prevents them from making decisions about their lives. In reality, the Bill: 
will mean thousands of patients dying for want of ordinary treatment. 'Treatment' under the Bill is defined as "includ[ing] a diagnostic or other procedure" (section 60). This would include tube-feeding, giving sedatives or pain-killers, and possibly spoon-feeding and turning patients to prevent bedsores. (Food and fluids delivered by tube is not "life-support" or "medical treatment" but basic care.) 
creates government-appointed "independent consultees" who will have power to tell NHS doctors not to give life-saving treatment to incapacitated patients (sections 34-39). 
would make advance decisions ("living wills") legally binding, including those with a suicidal intent (sections 24-29) - a long-standing objective of the Voluntary Euthanasia Society and the worldwide euthanasia movement. 
undermines doctors' common-law duty to protect the life and health of patients - doctors who insist on treating patients properly could be charged with criminal offences (explanatory notes to section 26). 
undermine patient's clinical best interests - i.e. health - by prioritising subjective, non-clinical considerations such as "wishes and feelings" (section 4) 

The present government says it is against euthanasia. But it makes a qualification. While it claims to oppose the idea of active euthanasia - such as lethal injections - it supports changing the law to allow euthanasia 'by neglect'. 

5> Medical Capacity Bill -Contd 

Four key facts about the Mental Capacity Bill 

1. Leading experts oppose the Bill because it means legalised killing 

Leading human rights lawyer Richard Gordon QC has concluded that the draft Bill was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. "The obvious scope for treating vulnerable persons contrary to their best interests in [the Bill] and in a way which deprives them of life is considerable." Dr. Jacqueline Laing, D.Phil (Oxon.), senior lecturer in law at London Metropolitan University has concluded that the revised Bill "entrenches involuntary 'slow euthanasia' - a sanitised form of homicide - in hospitals".

Dr. Philip Howard, a senior lecturer in medicine in London and consultant physician, has predicted that conscientious doctors and nurses will be criminalised or forced to leave their profession if they continue present practices that save the lives of suicidal patients. 

Dr John Fleming, director of the Southern Cross Bioethics Institute and a foundation member of UNESCO's International Bioethics Committee, has predicted that a demand for euthanasia by lethal injection would be created by the horror of the long, drawn-out deaths by dehydration permitted under the Bill. 
2. The euthanasia lobby supports the Bill 

The Voluntary Euthanasia Society (VES) welcomed the draft Bill, so it is not only opponents of euthanasia who believe that it promotes euthanasia. It is no coincidence that "living wills" - a key part of the Bill called "advance decisions" - were invented by the euthanasia movement in the late 1960s; the VES is the UK's leading promoter of "living wills". The Bill would make advance decisions legally-binding, including suicidal ones. The worldwide euthanasia movement has declared that the legalisation of euthanasia by neglect is one of its key goals in its campaign to legalise euthanasia by lethal injection: "If we can get people to accept the removal of all treatment and care--especially the removal of food and fluids--they will see what a painful way this is to die and then, in the patient's best interests, they will accept the lethal injection" (Dr Helgha Kuhse, then president of the World Federation of Right-to-Die Societies, 1984) 

The joint parliamentary committee which endorsed the draft Bill last year also endorsed the notion of a "right to die". The committee was stacked with the government supporters as well as members with close ties or official links with organisations supporting the Bill. 

Among the Bill's supporters, many support a "right to die", in particular Patient Concern, led by senior Voluntary Euthanasia Society veteran activist Roger Goss. 
3. The "safeguards"in the Bill will be ineffective 

The Bill as presented is substantially more dangerous than the draft version. Promised so-called "safeguards" made to the Bill will be ineffective: "[The draft bill] not only lacks sufficient safeguards to prevent harm or abuse to patients, it is difficult to see what safeguards might be of any use" (Dr John Fleming). They will be flouted, just as the "safeguards" in the Abortion Act which are routinely flouted, allowing abortion on demand. 
4. Disability rights groups oppose the Bill 

Several organisations representing people with learning disabilities opposed the draft Bill: 
"Values into Action believes that the draft Mental Incapacity Bill...far from protecting vulnerable people actually substantially increases their vulnerability..."; 
"Changing Perspectives have concerns that the Mental Incapacity Bill will violate the fundamental rights of people without perceived capacity" 
"People First do not like this Bill because it will take away our independence and break our human rights.... If the draft Mental Incapacity Bill becomes law it will be a very big step backwards for people with learning difficulties' rights." 

First published by Deepankar Choudhury on  Mar 10, 2011

Saturday, 14 September 2013

Mahatma Gandhi and Dr. Martin Luther King:

THERE CANNOT BE A BETTER WAY TO CELEBRATE BLACK HISTORY MONTH THAN BY COMPARING TWO OF WORLD'S GREATEST ADVOCATES OF PEACE & NON-VIOLENCE. 

A comparison of goals and programs advocated by Gandhi and King:* 

Gandhi 

- Self-purification as a condition for achieving political independence 
(e.g. fasts) 
- Development of village industries and sanitation 
- Adult education and health programs 
- Elimination of liquor 
- Use of spinning wheel in every home 
- Organization of Labor satyagrahas (e.g. Ahmedabad in 1918) 


King 

- Federal grants for housing, employment, and education 
- 1963 Bill of rights for the disadvantaged 
- Government-guaranteed income 
- Development of black co-ops 
- Breadbasket programs 
- Organization of unions 


* From 
‘The Influence of Gandhi on Martin Luther King Jr.’ by Thomas Kilgore Jr., page 241 


First published by Deepankar Choudhury on Feb 27, 2011

FRANK SINATRA (Top-20 Favorites)

Here is my list of Top-20 of Frankie 

- sound of my soul 
01>All the way. 
02>Strangers in the night. 
03>Softly as I leave you. 
04>The coffee song. 
05>Love & marriage 
06>Learning the blues. 
07>I fall in love too easily 
08>Just one of those things. 
09>Deep in a dream 
10>Newyork Newyork 
11>Give me 5 minutes 
12>Something 
13>I get a kick out of you. 
14>How deep is the ocean 
15>Young at heart 
16>That's life 
17>Come fly with me 
18>Fly me to the moon 
19>One for my baby & one for the road 
20>Come rain or come shine 

not necessarily in this order.

The list may change with mood. 


Let's have yours 

REALITY SHOWS

India's not so real reality shows have a long history of imitating the western shows and are now marked by crass street language and violence. The fight for viewership has gone to such a level that the Indian television channels are ready to air any form of shows even at the cost of the culture and values of the nation. 
1>'Kaun Banega Crorepati' inspired by 'Who wants To Be a Millionaire', 
2>'Indian Idol' inspired by American Idol. 
3>Big Boss inspired by Big Brother 
4>'Iss Jungle Se Mujhe Bachao' inspired by 'I'm a Celebrity..Get Me out of Here! 
5>'Pati, Patni Aur Who inspired by 'Baby Borrowers' 
6>'Sach Ka Saamna',inspired by 'The Moment of Truth' 
7>'Zor Ka Jhatka: inspired by 'Wipeout' 

May be many more are waiting. 
Can't We Be Originals 
Calling all Javed Akhters & Gulshan Nandas. 



P.S.:- I do not claim to have viewed all these serials. The above article is for general discussion only.

International Mother Language Day

Amar Bhai er Rokte Rangano Ekushe February 
Ami Ki Bhulite Pari 
Chhelehara Shoto Mayer Ashru, Gorra e February 
Ami Ki Bhulite Pari. 

Stained with the Blood Of My Brother 
O 21st February 
Can I ever Forget! 

In 1952 the Language Movement served as a platform for Bengali Nationalism. Students sacrificed their lives for their Mother Language,BANGLA. For the first time in world history a country defined itself by its language & culture. 

Language Heroes: Rafiq, Salam, Barkat, Jabbar, Shafiur Rahman, Ahi Ullah, Abdul Awal, An unidentified boy... 
Bangla Language Day, popularly known as Ekushe (21) February, is one of the most significant days, not in Bangladesh only, but in human history because on that day the valiant Bangalee boys gave their lives to defend their sweet mother tongue, Bangla language. Over the centuries people gave their lives for love, faith, freedom, nation and the state. But on 21 February 1952, ever in history, a bunch of young Bangalee students gave their lives in a protest rally at the Dhaka university campus against the Pakistani authority's attempt to impose Urdu (as the state language of Pakistan) over the 70 million Bangalees of East Bangla (then East Pakistan). 

International Mother Language Day is an observance held annually on 21 February worldwide to promote awareness of linguistic and cultural diversity and multilingualism. It was first announced by UNESCO on 17 November 1999. Its observance was also formally recognized by the United Nations General Assembly in its resolution establishing 2008 as the International Year of Languages. 
International Mother Language Day originated as the international recognition of Language Movement Day, which has been commemorated in Bangladesh (formerly East Pakistan) since 1952, when a number of University of Dhaka students were killed by the Pakistani police and army in Dhaka during Bengali Language Movement protests. 

P.S:-1> BANGALEES WORLD WIDE ARE PROUD OF BANGLADESH WHERE BANGLA IS NATIONAL LANGUAGE 
2> I pay my Homage to all those brave hearts who made the Supreme Sacrifice in favor of the Language of more than 150 million populace World wide.


First published by Deepankar Choudhury on Feb 19, 2011